Access reviews that are real — not rubber-stamped
First-class User Access Review campaigns with per-entitlement decisions, so reviewers actually keep, revoke or modify access — with the evidence to prove it.
Auditors increasingly reject access reviews that are a screenshot of a spreadsheet. Comply runs proper UAR campaigns: entitlements are pulled in, each row gets a keep/revoke/modify decision from the right reviewer, and the whole campaign is captured as substantive evidence.
Campaign workflows
Launch quarterly reviews with reviewers, scopes and deadlines built in.
Per-entitlement decisions
Reviewers keep, revoke or modify each entitlement — with bulk actions for speed.
Substantive evidence
Every decision and timestamp is recorded, so the review stands up at audit.
Segregation of duties
Flag toxic combinations and SoD conflicts as part of the review.
Up and running fast
Import entitlements
Pull access from your IdP and cloud connectors.
Review
Reviewers decide each row; bulk-keep the obvious.
Prove
The campaign is stored as audit-ready evidence.
- Per-row keep / revoke / modify
- Reviewer assignment & deadlines
- SoD conflict detection
Common questions
Because a screenshot does not prove anyone actually evaluated each entitlement. Comply records a decision and timestamp per row, which is what makes a review substantive.
They are pulled from your identity and cloud connectors, or imported in bulk, then routed to the right reviewer.
Explore the rest of the platform
26 modules, one system. Here's where teams go next.
See your compliance prove itself
Start free in minutes, or get a guided demo. No credit card, no per-seat surprises.
Free tier: 1 framework · 10 workers · 2 connectors. Upgrade only when you grow.